A losing battle.

 When the scientific method is used in the so called Ufology only one hypothesis is consistent with recurrent observational data: that anomalies are living entities of some sort, no other hypothesis from Ufology is fully consistent with the recurrent and consistent observational data available and coming in almost in a daily basis. 

 No by chance the idea of anomalies being living beings is "suppressed" by the hardcore UFO believers, but nobody will be able to deny in the long run what current data is clearly implying, with more people using high optical magnification equipment the amount of evidence pointing in that direction will only increase, hardcore UFO believers are fighting a losing battle. 

 And the ironic thing is that accepting that anomalies are living entities do not exclude at all some truth in the extraterrestrial hypothesis ETH, but the hardcore nuts and bolts ET believers are so narrow minded that they will not "bend" for anything less than what they want. 

 Some people exposing this narrow mindset even dedicate very little time trying to get solid evidence of what they believe is the truth and instead dedicate a lot of efforts and time "attacking" the people that are providing evidence almost in a daily basis, almost all people making these "attacks" hardly can be considered as active observers and the tools that they use are really very outdated, but they pretend to be "experts" in the field with many years of experience, experience that had taught very little to them, but these people dedicate a lot of time and effort "attacking" and belittling anything done for anybody that do not follows their very narrow agenda, I want to repeat what is in the title of this post: they are fighting a losing battle.

What is a scientific view of reality?

What is a Scientific View of Reality?

 A scientific view of the world/reality is a view that is unconditional servant of consistent observational data, were no idea or theory of reality is ever cherished or final because new observational data may contradict it and then that idea or theory must be modified/discarded.

 When scientific theories start being "cherished" they start becoming dogmas, anybody questioning it will be labeled as a "crank" by fellow "scientists", beyond this point that is not science anymore and not different from any religious dogmas. 

 Today Official Science is a big mix of that, questioning cherished ideas had become tantamount of professional suicide, we already have "dissident" scientists and new ideas are heavily attacked, the scientific stablishment had become in fact the Inquisition of modern times and the damage done by that systemic/endemic/pathological modus operandi is really impossible to measure.

Highly polymorphic digit "1" anomaly 11/28/15 10:29am EST.

 Another example of anomaly with dynamic geometry, self luminous and taking digit shapes, in this case digit "1".

Polymorphic/variable geometry anomaly 12/11/15 4:45pm EST.

 One example of anomaly with variable geometry:

Electrostatic plasma ball like anomaly 01/07/16 3:07pm EST.

Electrostatic Plasma ball like anomaly, this is a good example showing an anomaly that behave like a living being and also an example of anomaly very far of being similar to any known mundane object. But once anomalies are studied in detail very likely it will be recognized that they are part of earth environment as any other living being.

Three simple steps for systematically observing anomalies.

 The validation of observational claims can only be done by trying to duplicate the same observations by independent observers, many things that we assume to be real can be validated that way, the reality of birds for example: anybody in many regions of the world will be able to observe birds and verify by themselves their reality, no because pictures of birds appear in many places, nothing can replace direct experience.
 Now the reality of anomalies is an observational claim that can only be validated by observational data confirming their reality coming from multiple independent observers, that already is in place, there are multiple detailed consistent footage that gives solid footing to the reality of anomalies, but again nothing can replace direct experience and there are very clear and objective procedures that if followed will allow anybody to observe these amazing objects/manifestations in any location in our planet in daylight with a clear sky, the confirmation/validation of the reality of anomalies is available to anyone that really wants to observe them, the unscientific approach of denying new facts or claims without doing any due diligence and using simplistic/closeminded debunking arguments is as old as man himself and was used as the main argumentative tool by the Inquisition against the new ideas that contradicted the religious dogmas, today we have many self titled scientists using exactly the same modus operandi.

 These are three basic/simple steps that will allow anybody to systematically observe anomalies.

1- Infrared spotting: It is well known that the sky scattering of visible light is higher in the blue portion of the visible electromagnetic spectrum than in the red segment of that spectrum, the reason why the sky is blue, but this scattering is even lower in the infrared portion of the spectrum and lower still in the short radiowave portion of the electromagnetic spectrum.

 One direct implication of this facts around the sky scattering of visible light in daylight is that if we use narrow band filters to look at the sky, filters that allow only a very narrow segment of the electromagnetic spectrum to pass, the relative reflection of any object in the atmosphere respect to the sky scattering will be higher when we move to the red portion of the spectrum and even higher in the infrared or short radiowave segment of the spectrum, but since we can see objects by the light that they reflect(or not) then that means that any reflective object in the atmosphere will be more "relatively bright" when we observe this object in the infrared or short radiowave segment of the electromagnetic spectrum, in other words: the object will be more easily "spotted" in infrared than in visible light and that is fully confirmed by practice.
 Stars are masket by the sky scattering of visible light in daylight, but many bright stars can be spotted in daylight if using narrow band infrared pass filters and digital cameras that are sensitive to infrared.
 That is the basic idea of spotting in infrared, by spotting in infrared many more objects will be visible than if spotting in visible light.
 Anomalies are usually small and bright, like stars, and usually move at relatively high altitudes, they are masked in daylight as the stars are, but they can be spotted more easily if using infrared pass filters with digital cameras sensitive to infrared.

2- The use of high optical magnification equipment able to resolve the details of distant objects.

 Since anomalies usually move at high altitudes you will need high magnification optical equipment to be able to see their structure details otherwise you will only see bright dots of light.
 That means that you need to use telephoto lens, medium sized telescopes or, in the lower end, superzoom cameras as the Canon sx50, sx60 or Nikon p600, p900.

3- Send direct signals to the anomalies spotted.

 Anomalies will change behavior and body geometry in response to direct signals sent to them, once this responses are observed any doubts about the reality of anomalies will evaporate, this is a critical step.

Armchair theorists should learn from engineers.

Engineers know the value of telemetric(observational) data, when building sophisticated prototype equipment or machinery it is well known that telemetric data takes precedence over any forecasting data produced by any theoretical model of the prototype equipment under consideration, these theoretical models must be fine-tuned/modified to match telemetric data, observational data is king. 

 But today we have many armchair theorists thinking that reality should be the one bending to their models of reality, they think that their models of reality are more real than reality itself, they are unable to do what engineers do all the time: modify their models to fit observational data. 

 Engineers are forced to act in synchronization with reality otherwise the equipment/machinery that they may build will not work properly. 

 But apparently armchair "experts" can get away with their ineptitude and pretend that the world behave in the way that they imagined independently of the observational data presented to them. Luckily for them the machines/equipment that they use in a daily basis were build for engineers knowing very well the value of observational data.

 Reality is like a very complex machinery that always is in prototype state, telemetric (observational) data about the behavior of this complex machinery always is coming from multiple sources, any models or ideas that we may have about the reality machinery must be adjusted to fit that observational data, as engineers do all the time, observational data reign suppreme in that sense because our ideas of reality should be unconditional "servants" of that observational data. 

 That is the truly scientific and objective(engineering) approach to reality, today many self titled scientists are very far of following that approach, that is why they denied the reality of meteorites for many years and today they are denying/ignoring the reality of anomalies, any engineer doing that in a similar situation will produce faulty machinery, scientists doing that today are producing faulty ideas of reality.