A losing battle.

 When the scientific method is used in the so called Ufology only one hypothesis is consistent with recurrent observational data: that anomalies are living entities of some sort, no other hypothesis from Ufology is fully consistent with the recurrent and consistent observational data available and coming in almost in a daily basis. 

 No by chance the idea of anomalies being living beings is "suppressed" by the hardcore UFO believers, but nobody will be able to deny in the long run what current data is clearly implying, with more people using high optical magnification equipment the amount of evidence pointing in that direction will only increase, hardcore UFO believers are fighting a losing battle. 

 And the ironic thing is that accepting that anomalies are living entities do not exclude at all some truth in the extraterrestrial hypothesis ETH, but the hardcore nuts and bolts ET believers are so narrow minded that they will not "bend" for anything less than what they want. 

 Some people exposing this narrow mindset even dedicate very little time trying to get solid evidence of what they believe is the truth and instead dedicate a lot of efforts and time "attacking" the people that are providing evidence almost in a daily basis, almost all people making these "attacks" hardly can be considered as active observers and the tools that they use are really very outdated, but they pretend to be "experts" in the field with many years of experience, experience that had taught very little to them, but these people dedicate a lot of time and effort "attacking" and belittling anything done for anybody that do not follows their very narrow agenda, I want to repeat what is in the title of this post: they are fighting a losing battle.