In anomalies observations the only clear path is to be clinically objective.

 The only clear path that can be followed in the area of anomalies studies/observations, what can be considered as the real Ufology, is to follow a "clinically objective" approach. 

 Classical Ufology had been stagnant for more than 60 years precisely by not following an objective approach and being drown, trapped in a maze of claims that are impossible to verify by direct observations. That is exactly the reason why classical Ufology can not be considered as a science as compared for example to Biology that have its specific objects of interest that are observed and studied directly by biologists. By assuming that anomalies are Ufology's subjects of interest then Ufology can be considered then as a science with its specific subjects of interests, by direct observation and study of anomalies ufologists can do exactly what biologists had been doing in Biology.

 The wonders of science that we are using almost any instant today had come to be as the result of applying "actionable/objective" procedures, all actionable knowledge that we have today about anomalies(knowledge that still the nuts and bolts UFO believers are denying) had been the result of applying objective procedures. 

 No actionable knowledge about anomalies had come to be as the result of following non-objective instructions or "revelations", no tool/instrument used to observe/objetivize anomalies had been the result of any subjective revelation either but the result of hard science/actionable knowledge. You can watch or listen to as many "Bashar" "revelations" as you want but you will not find a single actionable insight in any of them. 

 Clinical objectivity is the answer and only accepting claims supported by consistent and recurrent observations, the core of the scientific method, the success of this approach is really undeniable.